Whether you receive money or service credits, both are probably not to cover the costs of lost businesses or to lose your business completely. Good infrastructure and application design are still needed to integrate resilience. However, ALS can be a factor in design, for example. B if the risks need to be split among multiple cloud providers in relation to a highly resistant local architecture. One way or another, don`t call it ALS if you don`t. However, note that any service issue with public cloud providers only returns a fraction of your costs, does not resonate with your losses and only applies if you continue to use their service. If you are really unhappy and you continue, you will have nothing. Today, many organizations use internal ALSs to indicate what they will and will not do to support other internal areas within the organization when the business is interrupted. Wikipedia defines a Service Level Agreement (SLA) as an “official obligation that prevails between a service provider and a customer.
Specific aspects of the service – quality, availability, responsibilities – are agreed between the service provider and the user of the service. In my experience, I have always viewed alS as a contractual agreement for services, with penalties or repairs if these services are not provided under the agreed terms of service. Imagine my surprise when I saw (during a presentation at Tech Field Day) that IBM uses the term SLA directive in its backup software. What exactly is the type of relationship between the service provider and the customer? A brief exchange on Twitter this morning made me think that many people think that the only type of ALS available is the one that provides recourse in service credits. I think it`s mostly based on the public cloud experience. That`s perfectly reasonable. Look at Amazon`s S3-SLA, and you can see that AWS service credit refunds are at best 25% for an outage of less than 99% of operating time. Operating time is defined in a very specific way and, of course, there are the usual force majeure exclusions such as “things out of our control”. Redmond Worldwide believes that Service Level Agreements (SLAs) are very useful in assessing the performance of service providers.